They should be removed or at minimum the person should have a means of themselves effecting the removal. Similarly, if a person uninstalls an app, then retaining it is no longer necessary to the purpose intended by that person. In this case, if a person has not themselves installed an app like candy crush, then there is no intended purpose in retaining it as part of their States and Canada, which explicitly impose the condition.
Requirement in many jurisdictions, including U.S. This principle is so foundational that it is included as a legislated
A foundational principle of good privacy practices, as subscribed toīy most Western governments, is that personal information should only be retained when it is necessary to achieve a purpose clearly intended by the person to whom that information relates. Because the library is associated with a specific individual, the information it contains qualifies as "Personal Information" under the privacy laws of most jurisdictions. While Microsoft feels like it's the only game in town these days, this continuing escalation of hostilities toward device owners will eventually come back to haunt the company.Ģ. Impose such trivialities on its customers. Which inevitably leads to a discussion about whether or not it really is a good idea for them to move to Windows 10 if Microsoft is going so far as to To explain to a grown man that the grown man in front of him is not obsessed with some child's game.
Now they have also added something called "Candy Crush Soda Saga." With two Candy Crush apps prominently displayed in the library, it is embarrassing Nobody asked if we wanted "CandyĬrush Saga" associated with our names, but Microsoft made that decision for us. Having some apps forced into the customers library can be an embarrassment requiring explanation to clients when, for example, you are walking them through how to find and manage different apps with Windows 10. I see this thread is over a year old with no update from Microsoft.ġ.
0 kommentar(er)
